JPAStorageService Configuration Failure (Windows Jetty)

McLennan, Neil R n.mclennan at imperial.ac.uk
Mon Mar 4 14:50:27 EST 2019


Scott,

Thanks, would you suggested a memcached model instead for back channel sessions?
(Don’t see much of a difference given the Tech we have)

Neil 


On 4 Mar 2019, at 19:30, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

>> Consent records is the primary reason for using it, however i had hoped to
>> maintain session in a cluster. Sticky network load balancing is fine, except for
>> back channel responses
> 
> It's not needed for a back channel and you most definitely shouldn't use it for that.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> -- 
> For Consortium Member technical support, see https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net


More information about the users mailing list