Scripted attribute dependencies

[Cantor, Scott]

On 2/22/19, 7:48 PM, "users on behalf of Wessel, Keith" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

> Also, is there a better way to handle my conditionals than checking for a type not of undefined and a list with a size
> greater than 0?

No, that's what I've always done. I think the "could be empty" case is more of the documented interface we intended. The shorter check you were using is more the "taking advantage of a particular implementation" approach that we wouldn't be officially supported.

Having some sort of function built-in to the scripting environment to shorten the error handling would be nice. I don't know if it's possible or not but I would think we could come up with something.

-- Scott