Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at
Fri Sep 21 18:16:31 EDT 2018

> >I think you have the check backwards, since as documented the condition has
> to be false if you want the warning to happen
> Yes, I missed this earlier. You saved my Friday evening :)

Don't even ask me why that is, at this point the only answer that really matters is "that's just what it is and changing it breaks everybody". I'm sure whatever the reason was made sense at the time.

-- Scott

More information about the users mailing list