nameid-format:unspecified for relying party

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at
Fri Jul 13 12:30:08 EDT 2018

On 7/12/18, 11:06 PM, "users on behalf of Baron Fujimoto" <users-bounces at on behalf of baron at> wrote:

> It says "No formats specified in configuration" and I wind up with the transient NameID format. Don't the 
> DefaultRelyingPartyConfigurationResolver and SelectRelyingPartyConfiguration logs above show that it should be using > the relying-party entry with id=""? If so, is that the correct way to specify the 
> nameIDFormatPrecedence? Not sure what else to look for.

Me either, I don't really see anything there that fits. Either there's a bug or I'm not seeing something, but nobody has identified any bugs I can find in JIRA after all this time. If you're not on the latest version, then that's the next step.

-- Scott

More information about the users mailing list