OpenSAML build test failures

[Cantor, Scott]

> I know, but this worked with 2.6.  There seems to be a hash algorithm
> mismatch here, SHA1 vs SHA256.  Maybe some default differs?  Here's the
> trace output:

Oh, right, that would be the default signing change, some of that's down in the stack. I didn't get around to fixing that. Rod's messing with some of the tests now, he could probably get that one patched.

-- Scott