Hyland OnBase

[Michael Hodges]

An update.  OB17 features an OB IdP server that all three OB clients (web,
unity, native) utilize for AuthN.  We will proxy it to our CAS
implementation such that all three OB clients will invoke our CAS for
AuthN.  For AuthZ, LDAP groups will be utilized.  So that means we are
using a CAS license rather than a SAML license.  OB finds that distinction
important for some reason.

 - Michael


On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Michael Hodges <mhodges at hawaii.edu> wrote:

> In case anyone is interested:
>
> During a conference call that included Hyland and the VAR we are workign
> with, it was confirmed that OB 17 can integrate with both Shib and CAS.  As
> it happens, we plan to integrate with CAS (we are hosting onsite).
>
>  - Michael
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Michael Hodges <mhodges at hawaii.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> U of Hawaii is implementing OB 17; we are a new Hyland customer.  Anyone
>> succeeded in a Shib integration yet?  Hopefully we are the ones that break
>> the ice, but if we are, we'll gladly report back what we learn.
>>
>> If anyone has done a CAS integration that would be interesting too,
>> though off topic :-)
>>
>>  - Michael
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Curry, Warren <whcurry at ufl.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Similar Experience with us at UF..    ,   THE client security leverages
>>> some data from non SHIB sources.
>>>
>>> Web stuff we secured with Shib.     The question should never be asked
>>> "do you support SAML2"   /  Vendor say yes..  then we m ust say show me how
>>> and you specific s before a purchase gets made.
>>>
>>> We to heard of the future promises.    I can talk to our Hyland folks a
>>> bit to see if there is a horizon for change that is known.
>>>
>>> -whc
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Nate
>>> Klingenstein
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:39 PM
>>> To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
>>> Subject: Re: Hyland OnBase
>>>
>>> I’ll know either a whole lot less or a whole lot more after a few days.
>>> The list of options extended so far has included a whole lot of stuff and
>>> ADFS was not one of them, so the story here is easily as weird as it was
>>> last told to you.  Thanks for this information — forewarned is...
>>>
>>> … much appreciated. :D
>>>
>>> Take care,
>>> Nate.
>>>
>>> > On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:27, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 1/20/16, 2:22 PM, "users on behalf of IAM David Bantz" <
>>> users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of dabantz at alaska.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> We would love to be able to use Shibboleth with OnBase, but the
>>> vendor's use of multiple client interfaces (not just web) complicates. My
>>> last investigation, 2015-03, determined their preferred "Unity" client
>>> supports SSO via ADFS but not SAML.
>>> >> I did hear a vague hope to incorporate SAML / Shibboleth support in
>>> the next major version upgrade of the "Unity" client.
>>> >
>>> > We're similarly afflicted. Not involved myself, so I wasn't aware they
>>> had said that.
>>> >
>>> > -- Scott
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>>> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>>> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>>> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20171010/3150e5e6/attachment-0001.html>