Change the "name=" value for the UID attribute definition for specific entityIDs
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Thu Oct 5 10:50:55 EDT 2017
> The example I'm referring to in services.xml.
That's a very specific case of needing additional beans to drive a Resource type and the bean there *is* a Resource. Yours isn't.
> - Now the non-specified SP receives only the default attribute, while the
> specified SP receives both.
Yes, that's the case I mentioned that may or may not be what you want but might influence the value of bothering with doing it like this. Most of the time that SP won't care though.
More information about the users