NameID configuration per relying party

[Boyd, Todd M.]

Fair point. I'll give it a shot. Thanks!

-Todd


-----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 9:26 AM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: RE: NameID configuration per relying party

> So, I'm already filtering the attribute--you're saying I should remove 
> the activationCondition XML from my config so that anybody else that 
> needs this format for NameID can be handled in an easier fashion?

More so you just have less configuration to worry about, but that's a side effect.
 
-- Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net