NameID configuration per relying party
Boyd, Todd M.
tmboyd1 at ccis.edu
Mon Oct 2 10:30:40 EDT 2017
Fair point. I'll give it a shot. Thanks!
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 9:26 AM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: RE: NameID configuration per relying party
> So, I'm already filtering the attribute--you're saying I should remove
> the activationCondition XML from my config so that anybody else that
> needs this format for NameID can be handled in an easier fashion?
More so you just have less configuration to worry about, but that's a side effect.
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users