Apache Shib SP and target URL rewrite

Jan Vilhuber JVilhuber at absolute.com
Thu Mar 16 02:18:09 EDT 2017


Thanks. All good suggestions. I appreciate them.

Jan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Peter Schober
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:05 PM
> To: users at shibboleth.net
> Subject: Re: Apache Shib SP and target URL rewrite
> 
> * Jan Vilhuber <JVilhuber at absolute.com> [2017-03-15 10:53]:
> > > [...] but what do you mean with passing things on to an external
> > > service, specifically? Unless the webserver with the Shib SP is
> > > acting as a reverse proxy to your "external resource" (i.e., no
> > > direct access is possible to the resource, but *only* through the
> > > proxy) that's likely insecure or requires a(nother) SSO protocol, or
> > > both. Cf.
> > > https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/NativeSPOneMany
> >
> > [JV:] Yes, apache is acting as a reverse proxy, so I can't use
> > environment variables, unfortunately. What I was referring to was that
> > I could write a short-ish cgi-script of some kind, that resides on the
> > server, and can thus use the environment (which is safer), gather the
> > data from them, and make an API call of some kind to a server that
> > resides behind the GW (and apache would not let direct access to).
> 
> I do occasionally proxy and send HTTP Headers, but then in all such cases the
> proxy and the proxied resource are actually on the same system (i.e., I put the
> Shib SP on the same machine), making this more of an operational issue, and
> less of a security one, IMO.
> 
> > imperfect steps :-/ And I can wrap some static api-key around this
> > internal (probably should have used that word instead of 'external'
> > which implies "out in the world") API call to give it the shine of
> > security.
> 
> If you're certain the proxied resource cannot be accessed other than from
> authorized requests (Shib) and through httpd+mod_proxy maybe simpy prefixing
> all attribute names with loooong and ugly strings would suffice, essentially
> appending "shared secrets" to them, making them harder to guess/inject.
> (Of course the data is still exposed on the network to the proxied resource
> unless you're proxying via TLS, too, e.g. using `SSLProxyEngine on` in httpd.) -
> peter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net


More information about the users mailing list