Shib 3.2.1

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/23/17, 2:43 PM, "users on behalf of Cheltenham, Chris" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of ccheltenham-ext at philasd.org> wrote:

> We have a vendor asking is we can use unspecified nameID format.

They probably don't need it. Use a Format that's appropriate for the data you send and they'll handle it just fine.

> Wasn’t that deprecated in SAML 2.0?

No, it just isn't supported as a distinct format by this software.

> I have read the SAML documentation 100 times and I still don’t know what the hell they are talking about in that nameID
> section.

Whether you're talking about SAML itself, or our documentation, "don't know what the hell they are talking about" is not something I can or will respond to.

-- Scott