conflicting attribute names in scripted attributes

[Cantor, Scott]

On 6/14/17, 11:59 AM, "users on behalf of Rod Widdowson" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:

> > Define attributes for each data source and feed /those/ as dependencies into the scripted attribute?
>
>Yup. The attribute called "foo" from dataconnector "bar" is different from the "foo" from dataconnector "toto" for as long as
>both "bar" and "toto" are not dependencies to the same attribute.  If they feed into the same attribute (or dataconnector) then
> the values get added together (for that attribute definition). 

But note that for both LDAP and RelationalDatabase, you can remap the names of the result attributes on the fly (with SQL you already can via aliasing, but the Column syntax that does it on the IdP end also works now for LDAP. So you can always just give them separate names there.

-- Scott