Android Application Question

[Nate Klingenstein]

> They will do nothing. Not my approach, not OIDC, not yours. Nothing. That's just what they do. You can't make it simple enough.
> It didn't though, not in the beginning. Why did it change? Because people wanted more. So think about that.

My premise is that there is a very narrow happy medium that we can guess 
at much more precisely now with all our experience trying to enable 
applications, work with SaaS, work with IdaaS, work with federation, 
work without federation, etc. etc.  The things we added aren't always 
things we'd add today.

The premise may be flat wrong, but I hope it's possible to design 
something that can be explained to application developers without asking 
or forcing them to rely on a distribution of curious pedigree.

If there is no such sweet spot, then yes, I'll share the nihilistic 
vision and just be glad I said my peace.