SAML1.1 attribute release on Shib 3
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Wed Feb 15 14:27:23 EST 2017
On 2/15/17, 2:10 PM, "users on behalf of Morris, Andi" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of amorris at cardiffmet.ac.uk> wrote:
> Strange, we have saml1.1 working with a reverse proxy currently, and it had been working well for years.
Then I would suggest you're missing a piece of information somewhere. There is something about what you're doing now you're not taking into account, but I don't know what it might be. The most likely is just that you're not proxying port 8443, only 443.
> That's on shib 2.
Both versions are going to require authentication of the query unless you have deliberately disabled the checking, and only one way of doing that works with proxies. And that way doesn't work out of the box with Shibboleth SPs operating in with the defaults, it doesn't sign messages sent over SOAP.
> Short of putting the IdP in the DMZ that's the only way I can see to do it, which could be an option I guess. It's far from
> ideal however.
Then I think you may be in for a surprise when you figure out what you're doing already.
My servers are load balanced at layer 4 with end to end TLS, though that isn't because of the back channel, it's because proxying makes it extremely difficult to get a trustworthy client address and operating an IdP without trustworthy client addresses is itself a much bigger security risk to my users than not proxying is. The concept of a DMZ means nothing to me, I don't trust any network.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list