activation condition WARN in v3.3

[Andrew Morgan]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Cantor, Scott wrote:

> On 2/1/17, 8:05 PM, "users on behalf of Andrew Morgan" 
> <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of morgan at orst.edu> wrote:
>
>> Is there some new way to specify this in v3.3?
>
> Somebody asked about this already, and I believe under a debugger I 
> concluded that when this happens it's actually attempting the conversion 
> first, and only after that point does it see that the other constructor 
> is the better one to use.
>
> so it probably isn't entirely accurate but the only way to get rid of 
> the warning is to just be explicit. It might work to actually add a type 
> indicator to the argument, but normally you just do it by naming the 
> constructor argument (candidates).

Ah, okay.  I tried using c:_candidates, but I couldn't get the format 
right.  Is there an example how to do it?  I didn't see one on the wiki 
page (Rod's comment only has 1 string).

Thanks,
 	Andy