Shibboleth SP behind load balancer with session affinity

Sean Townsend sean.campuslabs at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 21:39:51 EST 2017


That makes sense. Thanks!

— Sean

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:27 PM Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> On 12/4/17, 9:23 PM, "users on behalf of Cantor, Scott" <
> users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
>
> >  That is not the case. You are conflating two different cookies.
>
> Or I guess more accurately I'm talking about use of a different cookie
> that changes the point at which the affinity becomes an issue from before
> the login to after. That isn't terribly valuable or interesting since you
> either need stickyness or you don't. I was just trying to be precise since
> you were asking how it worked. It's likely easier to detect the problem by
> sticking with the relay state in memory so given that that was your
> original question, that's probably the best choice.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> --
> For Consortium Member technical support, see
> https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20171205/b4cbb78c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the users mailing list