logging the outgoing SAML

[Brent Putman]

On 8/31/17 2:45 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 8/31/17, 2:40 PM, "users on behalf of IAM David Bantz" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of dabantz at alaska.edu> wrote:
>
>> Seems a shame to add all that encrypted data to the logs just to get the outgoing SAML for a minority of unencrypted assertions
> Just pop in a RFE for a separate Assertion category.

IIRC, that's the way we originally did it.  But for some reason we
un-did it and make it just part of the regular Encrypter logging.  I
think the discussion is in the original issue.  But we can certainly
re-visit.