custom nameid format

Peter Schober peter.schober at
Wed Apr 26 12:16:17 EDT 2017

* Liam Hoekenga <liamr at> [2017-04-26 18:10]:
> Is that suggesting
> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.3 ?

No, that would be just


Though I'd question the validity of this OID specifically, which is

I also see mention of this at though that
page itself states "released as inetOrgPerson:employeeNumber", which
might be the better practice.

> Does it matter if you use SAML:1.1 or SAML:2.0 if you're making up a nameID
> format that isn't defined by the spec?



More information about the users mailing list