custom nameid format
peter.schober at univie.ac.at
Wed Apr 26 12:16:17 EDT 2017
* Liam Hoekenga <liamr at umich.edu> [2017-04-26 18:10]:
> Is that suggesting
> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:urn:oid:2.16.840.1.1137188.8.131.52 ?
No, that would be just
Though I'd question the validity of this OID specifically, which is
I also see mention of this at
https://spaces.ais.ucla.edu/display/uctrustwg/UCTrust+OIDs though that
page itself states "released as inetOrgPerson:employeeNumber", which
might be the better practice.
> Does it matter if you use SAML:1.1 or SAML:2.0 if you're making up a nameID
> format that isn't defined by the spec?
More information about the users