eduPersonEntitlement Format

[Tom Scavo]

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Brian Moon <bmoon at scu.edu> wrote:
>
> Given the examples we've seen in this thread for Xfinity and the library
> service, do you all tend to find that you can work with the SP to agree on a
> string in the entitlement field that conforms to your standard, or are you
> finding that the SP will dictate a string that you must use?

>From the IdP's point of view, I don't see why that matters. AFAIK, the
only standard entitlement value was mentioned by Gary:
“urn:mace:dir:entitlement:common-lib-terms”. Beyond that use case,
there are no standards, so I don't see why the IdP cares what value is
used in any particular case.

>From the SP's point of view, specifying a value (in the SP's
namespace) and requiring that of all IdPs is a reasonable thing to do
IMO.

Tom