"persistentId" in consent-intercept-config.xml

[Takeshi NISHIMURA]

Yeah. If it's just an example, I think it is good to make those lines in a comment, like MetadataProvider.

I understand it's for v2 users with legacy files, in order to automatically fit their general needs about consent. In other words, for those who already defined them.

For new users, it's just confusing. Especially they will never happen to create "transientId" and "persistentId" Attribute Definitions.

BTW, we cannot display values in NameID defined in saml-nameid.xml in the consent page, is this true?

Sincerely,
Takeshi

> 2016/09/17 2:25、Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> 
> On 9/16/16, 12:09 PM, "users on behalf of Takeshi NISHIMURA" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of takeshi at nii.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
>> Furthermore, such Attribute Definition for NameID is deprecated. I feel like the
>> configuration files in distribution are not consistent.
> 
> You mean because they're shown as blacklisted? I think that's just meant as an example, but it's probably a confusing one in context.