IdP3 Clustering...

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/30/16, 12:20 PM, "users on behalf of Peter Schober" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:

> So if you don't have to support SLO and Artifacts, and also don't
>    think you need to store consent centrally, and have well developed IDM
>    systems and processes, then congratulations, you should be able to run
>    your IDP without persisting anything!

You can support SLO (such as it is, which isn't saying much) with client-side state only.

Also, even if your IDM environment is messy, you can simply not support pairwise/persistent IDs. My deployment hasn't ever supported them and we're not hugely constrained by that, certainly not enough to make having a database a rational decision.

-- Scott