SP SRPM's

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/16/16, 8:26 PM, "users on behalf of Klingenstein, Nate" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of nklingenstein at calstate.edu> wrote:

>    Why on Earth would they sign that?  Isn't it pretty volatile?

Any signing it does is just automatic, but I'm not aware of it having signed that file. Digests are not signatures.

> These are the two options I'm assessing while staring at apxs nervously.

If it doesn't build the Apache module automatically, then the platform is broken and isn't worth wasting any time on. Solaris is in that category.

-- Scott