Chaining MetadataProvider and IdPv3
rdw at steadingsoftware.com
Thu May 19 12:58:21 EDT 2016
> 1) Why was the Chaining MetadataProvider type brought forward to IdPv3?
> Config compatibility, other?
Compatibility, particularly in old-style relying party configurations (plus
I added it before we realized we could get right of the need).
> Is it still mandatory?
ISTR that old style relying party needs it.
> 2) Is there any functional difference between having a Chaining element
> wrapped around two providers and having multiple EntityDescriptors beyond
> the modest control provided by the MetadataProvider configuration itself?
I'm not sure I understand the question. But I can tell you that all that
happens if the parser meets multiple metadata providers is that it grows an
implicit chaining provider and inserts it.
More information about the users