users Digest, Vol 57, Issue 62

[John Gasper]

Nate,

I do plan on getting a better support policy out:
https://github.com/Unicon/shibboleth-idp-dockerized/issues/13. I'll be
brainstorming there. Feel free to join me.

John

>Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 01:24:46 +0000
>From: Nate Klingenstein <nate.klingenstein at utah.edu>
>To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
>Subject: Re: Dockerized IdP
>Message-ID: <8840746F-83B1-4855-AA8D-2B3EC6FE4D02 at umail.utah.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>John,
>
>> If by supported you mean will this image live on and be maintained?
>>Then yes, I plan to keep it going.
>
>It was left deliberately vague and open-ended to get as much information
>as I could, which is a little sneaky, but for a good cause.  But yes,
>maintenance of the image is exactly what I was looking for.
>
>If you?re willing to go down in writing defining support down to any
>finer level of detail, no complaints, but I don't expect more.
>
>As an aside, the Docker terminology of ?image? versus ?container? blows
>me up every time.
>Nate.
>
>-