a scripted attribute definition example from the wiki

[Mark K. Miller]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Cantor, Scott wrote:

> On 7/27/16, 10:22 AM, "users on behalf of Mark K. Miller" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of max at psu.edu> wrote:
>
>>    Sadly, I have not found a way to eliminate this unwanted warning.  Can
>>    anyone tell me how to get rid of this?
>
> The Dependency syntax has always been broken since the "source" 
> designation was stuck on the parent element and isn't per-dependency, 
> and the warnings pop out any time you do things that may "accidentally" 
> work but are still potentially ambiguous in ways the IdP can't know are 
> safe.
>
> Using multiple dependencies at the same time can easily create weird 
> problems and only the deployer knows if they're iffy. You can suppress 
> the warning in logback, basically.

All the other syntactic banter I stirred up with my question aside, I 
loosely translated this answer to mean 'use variant 1 at your own risk.' 
So, being 'risk averse' about this sort of thing, I opted for trying 
"Variant 2".  "Variant 2" works so well that, had I only started with that 
in the first place, I wouldn't have had any question to post to the list 
about at all.

> -- Scott

Thanks!

Max