a scripted attribute definition example from the wiki

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/27/16, 10:56 AM, "users on behalf of Peter Schober" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:

> Any chance of getting support for a correct syntax added (i.e.,
> changing the custom schema) where the sourceAttributeID can also be an
> attribute on the Dependency element?
>
> In addition to the current, legacy (and partially broken) sytax?

Rod can weigh in, but I believe it's not as simple as just making that change, it requires some redesign of the resolver code. The design flaw has been baked in for most of its life.

-- Scott