Hyland OnBase

[Curry, Warren]

Similar Experience with us at UF..    ,   THE client security leverages some data from non SHIB sources.   

Web stuff we secured with Shib.     The question should never be asked "do you support SAML2"   /  Vendor say yes..  then we m ust say show me how and you specific s before a purchase gets made.  

We to heard of the future promises.    I can talk to our Hyland folks a bit to see if there is a horizon for change that is known.  

-whc

-----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Nate Klingenstein
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:39 PM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: Re: Hyland OnBase

I’ll know either a whole lot less or a whole lot more after a few days.  The list of options extended so far has included a whole lot of stuff and ADFS was not one of them, so the story here is easily as weird as it was last told to you.  Thanks for this information — forewarned is...

… much appreciated. :D

Take care,
Nate.

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:27, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> 
> On 1/20/16, 2:22 PM, "users on behalf of IAM David Bantz" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of dabantz at alaska.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> We would love to be able to use Shibboleth with OnBase, but the vendor's use of multiple client interfaces (not just web) complicates. My last investigation, 2015-03, determined their preferred "Unity" client supports SSO via ADFS but not SAML.
>> I did hear a vague hope to incorporate SAML / Shibboleth support in the next major version upgrade of the "Unity" client.
> 
> We're similarly afflicted. Not involved myself, so I wasn't aware they had said that.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net