old v2.x IdP behavior for RemoteUser and isPassive

[Nate Klingenstein]

This matches my recollection as well.

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 09:37, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> includes "This login handler does not support the SAML 2 forced re-
>> authentication or passive authentication feature."
>> 
>> Do you happen to recall if "does not support" meant that the IdP would send
>> the SP a SAML error if the SP included isPassive in the authnRequest?
> 
> I believe so, yes.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net