Novell/NetIQ IDM and Shibboleth

[Schwoerer, Brad]

Tom,

I understand the breadth of all of those numbers.  What I don't know is how many of these deployments make use of NetIQ as their identity management suite.  I am also not talking about a fault in NetIQ's normal access management products, but use of a product that is specific to act as an SP for some web based end user management products in their identity management suite.


-Bradley







On 2/12/16, 3:11 PM, "users on behalf of Tom Scavo" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Schwoerer, Brad <schwoerb at uww.edu> wrote:
>> I was curious how many institutions use NetIQ IDM products and also have
>> Shibboleth as their IDP.  The reason I am asking is, we use some of their
>> products and one of their products (OSP) that make use of SAML2 does not
>> work with a Shibboleth IDP, and I am looking for others that can help
>> persuade them to support more than NetIQ Access Manager as a SAML2 IdP.
>
>I'm not sure I understand what you're asking but either way, here are
>some facts:
>
>1) More than 90% of the IdP deployments in the InCommon Federation are
>Shibboleth.
>
>2) At least 80% of the IdP deployments in all of higher ed worldwide
>are Shibboleth. (The difference is simpleSAMLphp, which is used
>primarily, but not exclusively, by the so-called hub-and-spoke
>federations.)
>
>3) It is estimated that there are 2000 Shibboleth IdP deployments
>worldwide (which is more than all the others put together).
>
>4) AFAIK the only implementations capable of supporting multilateral
>federation out-of-the-box are Shibboleth and simpleSAMLphp. That is,
>these are the only implementations that consume SAML metadata
>according to the OASIS SAML Metadata Interoperability Profile.
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>Tom
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net