Shibboleth idp v3 unspecified NAMEIDFORMAT

[Cantor, Scott]

On 8/24/16, 4:07 PM, "users on behalf of Klingenstein, Nate" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of nklingenstein at calstate.edu> wrote:

> The developers are of the opinion that specification of "unspecified" is inherently a
> little silly, so the code base has actually been engineered to make it harder to use
> unspecified than any other name ID format in the world.

And there are virtually no SPs in the world that actually *require* that format, which demonstrates why we are of that opinion.

-- Scott