Can an intercept trigger a re-resolution of attributes?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 8/1/16 7:04 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
> 
> I don't know where you could really put it that's appropriate, but
> ironically putting it directly under the root is not actually going to
> conflict, the official attributes are left under the
> RelyingPartyContext. Which the above should do.

But if you wanted to be totally safe, the point of the context tree is
that you can add stuff yourself, so you would create your own Java class
derived from BaseContext, might be totally empty other than as a marker
in the tree. Then you'd get it to create the AttributeContext under that
node in the tree, so it would be your private location. That's how it's
meant to work. It's just not intuitive to build up the context functions
in Spring if you haven't been doing it for a while, but you can find
examples throughout the bean files.

-- Scott