Upgrading old v2 IdP, lots of deprecated/unsupported messages

Ian Bobbitt ibobbitt at grnoc.iu.edu
Fri Apr 29 13:32:11 EDT 2016

On 4/29/16 12:57 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick reply. I agree that both approaches SHOULD get me to
>> the same place. I'm worried that I'm going to
>> accidentally remove something that, while still letting it appear to work,
>> leaves us in an insure state. A lot of the
>> "ignored" lines come after stern warnings like:
> None of that content is used anymore. I will add a note to the Upgrade page about it.
>> Are they truly no longer needed, and don't need to be replaced with
>> something else?
> They're built in, you don't need it.
>> I apologize for what are probably obvious questions to everyone else. I'm
>> trying to get this somewhat neglected IdP
>> up-to-date, and internally understood, but I'm rather new to it.
> It's not an obvious question, I should have said something in the upgrade page about that comment.
> -- Scott


Thank you. I'm well on my way to a working, legacy free v3 IdP.


More information about the users mailing list