relying-party override and signResponses

[Powell, Alan]

I will file a bug report. I just wanted to make sure before pointing this
out to them. It seems better that they use ³true/false² so it would still
work if the check becomes less forgiving in the future...

>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:55:14 +0000
>From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu>
>To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
>Subject: RE: relying-party override and  signResponses
>Message-ID:
>	<9846A6064BD102419D06814DD0D78DE1128E5B65 at CIO-TNC-D2MBX02.osuad.osu.edu>
>	
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>>  p:signResponses="never" confused me as I though the new syntax was for
>>it
>> to be true or false. This example worked so I began to wonder and
>> discovered that this works
>
>It just accidentally has an effect. The type of that property is
>Predicate<ProfileRequestContext>, and we have converters that turn
>true/false into predicates.
>
>Can you please file a bug? We should be more explicit if we can and block
>use of other values.
>
>Being forgiving isn't strictly speaking an error but it's not helpful
>here.
>
>-- Scott
>
>
>