clustering with HazelcastStorageService

Paul B. Henson henson at cpp.edu
Thu Apr 28 03:08:49 EDT 2016


On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:32:00AM +0000, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> 
> I'll have to dig them all up, but actually it's not even possible in
> general, some of the use cases rely on random contexts, not fixed
> ones. The session cache stores records under contexts named for each
> session ID, not one big context.

Hmm, I would have thought the session cache would have instantiated one
instance of a storage engine for the entire idp, but it sounds like
you're saying it actually instantiates an instance for each individual
session? Or am I misunderstanding? I'm not quite sure what you mean by
session ID in this context. At least for the hazelcast storage backend,
each instance creates a hazelcast map, and creating a bunch of them
seems a lot less efficient than just creating one that's shared.

Thanks...

-- 
Paul B. Henson  |  (909) 979-6361  |  http://www.cpp.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst  |  henson at cpp.edu
California State Polytechnic University  |  Pomona CA 91768


More information about the users mailing list