template attribute definition possible bug?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/3/15, 4:40 PM, "users on behalf of Athanasios Douitsis" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of aduitsis at gmail.com> wrote:


>
>Yes that was my original hypothesis, source attribute name doesn't have any effect when dealing with attributes as sources.

Sorry, I didn't understand you were suggesting that, and if I had I wouldn't have believed it could be that broken.

>That settles it. You may want to adjust the example in the wiki of idpv2 which lists a couple of attributedefinition dependencies in a template.

I did, and added a warning.

-- Scott