Upgrading SP from SAML1 to SAML2
John Kamminga
jkamminga at ucmerced.edu
Fri Mar 13 14:53:17 EDT 2015
Hello, I've just taken over a Shibboleth IdP implementation and I went to one training seminar. Woohoo!
I have a Service Provider that is wanting to upgrade from SAML1 to SAML2. My first thought was I don't need to do anything because our IdP already accepts both.
However, they have received an error and asked me to fix it:(
ERROR [edu.internet2.middleware.shibboleth.idp.profile.AbstractSAMLProfileHandler:447] - No return endpoint available for relying party
I checked the Shib Wiki and it states this could be caused by 1 of 3 issues:
1. No or incorrect Metadata for SP
a. No metadata
b. Incorrect metadata
c. A service provider, issuing a SAML 2 request, sends an assertion consumer service index within a message
I'm not actually sure what this means:(
2. IdP doesn't support binding specified by SP
3. SP doesn't specify response endpoint
According to my relying-party configuration I'm accepting both SAML1 and SAML2 but require SAML2 to be signed. How can I tell if the problem is in the SP Metadata?
<rp:ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML1ArtifactResolutionProfile" signResponses="conditional"
signAssertions="never"/>
<rp:ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML2ArtifactResolutionProfile"
signResponses="never" signAssertions="always"
encryptAssertions="conditional" encryptNameIds="never"/>
Also, we are running Shibboleth IdP 2.4
Please let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks,
John Kamminga
Web Application Development
Information Technology Department
University of California, Merced
T: 209.228.2965<tel:209.228.2965>
E: jkamminga at ucmerced.edu<mailto:jkamminga at ucmerced.edu>
W: it.ucmerced.edu<http://it.ucmerced.edu/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20150313/e124de27/attachment-0001.html
More information about the users
mailing list