Question on response status codes on auth failure

[Stefan Santesson]

Very good observation.

I think I messed up here.

I first interpreted 1 and 2 as the first and second layer of nested codes,
but it clearly relates to SAML1 and SAML2.

In the SAML2 config there is already AuthnFaild configured, but it is
still nested under a ³Responder² error. That behaviour seems to be
hard-coded. Or?

/Stefan


On 22/06/15 17:55, "Peter Schober" <peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:

>* Stefan Santesson <stefan at aaa-sec.com> [2015-06-22 17:51]:
>> I tested to change in errors.xml in shibboleth.SAML1StatusMappings to:
>> 
>>         <entry key="InvalidCredentials"
>> value-ref="shibboleth.SAML2Status.AuthnFailed" />
>
>No idea what this is about but above you have SAML1
>("SAML1StatusMappings") and below SAML2 ("SAML2Status").
>-peter
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
>users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net