Metadata Changeover Questions
Peter Schober
peter.schober at univie.ac.at
Wed Jul 22 11:17:38 EDT 2015
* McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs <mckeanbs at jmu.edu> [2015-07-22 16:49]:
> > I assumed the OP already had SAML2 support in metadata and was merely
> > considering removing SAML1 wholesale. Seems that's not the case (no
> > sign of SAML2 for JMU, in 2015), so I misunderstood the much wider
> > implications of that question than removing potentially unneeded
> > SAML1 endpoints.
> Hmm, perhaps I don't fully understand the implications of the metadata
> myself. What I previously emailed was the current metadata, with the
> SAML2 elements there.
Based on the domain from your email address I looked at the InCommon
copy of your IDP's metdata (entityID urn:mace:incommon:jmu.edu) and
that has no sign of SAML2.0.
So I still think Scott is right and you're up for a long and hard
transition period.
-peter
More information about the users
mailing list