Metadata Changeover Questions
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Wed Jul 22 10:50:29 EDT 2015
On 7/22/15, 10:38 AM, "users on behalf of McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of mckeanbs at jmu.edu> wrote:
>Hmm, so essentially there isn't really a safe way to do it across the board without disruption?
A mass migration of a protocol? No, not really.
> I wasn't aware that SAML1 was that extensively required still.
Has nothing to do with it being required, it has to do with bad software, bad applications, or bad deployments (or all of the above).
>Just to make sure I understand correctly, some SPs/software literally just apply selective listening of sorts when it comes to metadata?
These aren't metadata matters, they're deployment issues. Supporting protocols seamlessly is not a feature of most software outside of Shibboleth and maybe SSP and even when it is, it's not necessarily handled properly when it comes to application integration.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list