IdP v2 to v3 migration success story

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/8/15, 5:22 PM, "users on behalf of Paul B. Henson" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of henson at cpp.edu> wrote:
>
>We are currently running CAS 3 and idp 2, and planning to upgrade to idp 3 by the end of the year (I'm waiting for CAS 4.1 before looking at that upgrade). I'm curious, is the CAS protocol support in the idp intended to supplant a standalone CAS deployment, or is it more intended for people already running the idp and wanting to add basic CAS support without the overhead of standing up another piece of software?

I think Marvin's been off, but speaking for the project, it's intended to supplant a stand alone deployment in the long term certainly.

> What features/functionality would you lose if migrating from CAS 3 to idp 3 rather than to CAS 4?

Can't answer that.

-- Scott