IdP 3: Support for SHA-512 signed Assertions

[jmarsch]

> For the record, there is really no strong reason to be using SHA-512 that
> I'm aware of.

Yah, I know.  Customers are asking that our product support 512 (probably
just because it sounds more secure).  The Shibboleth server I am working
just exists so that we can develop and test our SAML support.


 




--
View this message in context: http://shibboleth.1660669.n2.nabble.com/IdP-3-Support-for-SHA-512-signed-Assertions-tp7616940p7616989.html
Sent from the Shibboleth - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.