IdP v2 to v3 migration success story

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/1/15, 10:58 AM, "users on behalf of Peter Schober" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of peter.schober at univie.ac.at> wrote:



>While I understand (and mostly support) the reasoning wrt
>"unspecified" NameIDFormat I wonder if the aversion against that
>ill-defined specific value should overrule the otherwise default
>behaviour of picking the first format listed?

As far as I was aware V2 was doing the same thing, so it wasn't intended as a change. If I misread that code, then I guess it's a bug.

-- Scott