IdP3.2.1 metadata config and requireSignedRoot
trscavo at gmail.com
Tue Dec 22 13:36:09 EST 2015
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:
> On 12/22/15, 1:24 PM, "users on behalf of Tom Scavo" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>Well, I'd like to read the documentation since I don't see any
>>additional clarity in the new syntax.
> You don't think a setting that specifically requires the root element be signed should be called requireSignedRoot?
I had no idea that was referring to a root XML element. I thought it
was in some way referencing a root certificate.
More information about the users