IdP3.2.1 metadata config and requireSignedRoot

Tom Scavo trscavo at
Tue Dec 22 13:36:09 EST 2015

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at> wrote:
> On 12/22/15, 1:24 PM, "users on behalf of Tom Scavo" <users-bounces at on behalf of trscavo at> wrote:
>>Well, I'd like to read the documentation since I don't see any
>>additional clarity in the new syntax.
> You don't think a setting that specifically requires the root element be signed should be called requireSignedRoot?

I had no idea that was referring to a root XML element. I thought it
was in some way referencing a root certificate.


More information about the users mailing list