On 8/4/15, 1:29 PM, "users on behalf of McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of mckeanbs at jmu.edu> wrote: >That makes sense, but that would make me wonder why IDPv2 had worked with it in this scenario, without any special configuration that I'm aware of. Because whatever they don't like wasn't in the V2 response. -- Scott