SAML 2.0 Compliant

[Cantor, Scott]

On 4/14/15, 9:57 AM, "Brewer, Edward L" <lee.brewer at Vanderbilt.Edu> wrote:

>To all,
> 
>We are evaluating a product for access management and a vendor has made the claim concerning metadata consumption in their product
> 
>“If this is for Shibboleth, remember that Shib is SAML 2.0, but their metadata does not follow the standard exactly. “
> 
>Is this a true statement?

No, that's completely false.

-- Scott