SAML2 with WebMD

[Koch, Ken]

I believe I have everything configured. When I set assertionEncryption to false, the SAML token package looks good. However, when I set it to the default I no longer get a login prompt. Instead, the IDP redirects me straight to the target instead of prompting for AuthN. Ring any bells?


-Ken

From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Caskey, Paul
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 3:32 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: RE: SAML2 with WebMD

We did SAML with WebMd a few years ago.  And, yes we did IdP-initiated.

Otherwise, I don't recall anything special, other than bi-lateral metadata exchange (not through InCommon).


From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net<mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net> [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net] On Behalf Of Koch, Ken
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 3:10 PM
To: Shib Users
Subject: SAML2 with WebMD

Has anyone configured Shibboleth SAML2 with WebMD? We're midway through the process and they're strictly enforcing an IDP-initiated AuthN model only. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with that vendor.

We don't have any IDPUnsolicitedSSO right now and are mid-way in transition to IdPv3. From what I read, the IdPv2 docs still apply with no modifications to our 3.1.1 IdP?

____________________________________________________________
Ken Koch | Sr. Engineer
Information Services and Technology | Washington University in St. Louis
7425 Forsyth Blvd., Campus Box 1110 | St. Louis, MO 63105
w 314-935-8315 | c 314-223-7256 | ken at wustl.edu<mailto:ken at wustl.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20150403/e14f02a9/attachment.html