shibd Memory Usage

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/26/14, 12:18 PM, "Andy Bennett" <andyjpb at knodium.com> wrote:
>
>Oh yes, I see. We're not seeing much concurrency because we only access
>the FastCGIs during an actual Shibboleth Login event rather than on
>every page load. Indeed, we've only got one of each of the authorizer
>and responder actually running at the moment so I'd imagine that would
>limit the number of threads in shibd to around 2?

I don't know how FastCGI works exactly, I thought there was still a pool
of processes running each type of binary. There certainly is with Apache's
FCGI implementation.

-- Scott