servicenow SAML 2 integration

[Cantor, Scott]

On 5/8/14, 10:16 AM, "Michael R. Gettes" <gettes at cmu.edu> wrote:
>
>as a couple of folks have askedŠ  here is the contract language we use.
>When the company refuses to do InCommon we come up something custom but
>along similar lines.  From my experience I have decided to NOT promote
>SAML in contract and to specify shibboleth compatibility because I have
>had too many cases of a vendor saying ³we do SAML² and then it becomes a
>pissing contest on what means SAML so I decided to pursue the product
>compatibility path and I have had much greater success with this path.

Coincidentally, I was recently discussing internally whether to invest any
cycles in updating the saml2int profile, which you probably recall was
intended to help with that problem. It would be useful to me to know if
people are using that for this kind of purpose. If not, it's not a good
use of the project's time to bother with it.

-- Scott