Computed ID Data Connector

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/28/14, 10:14 AM, "Tom Scavo" <trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm not sure why that matters. The same computed ID paired with a
>different IdP entityID is in fact a different Persistent NameID,
>right?

Yeah, but I think there were factors like the fact that the original code
was used to produce a single value with a scope attached (but probably the
scope should have been enough of a fix), and also that in practice people
drop the qualifiers frequently. I can only guess that maybe mitigating
that risk was a thought, but that's a weak argument.

>Right, but I wanted to ask these questions first before I ran off and
>cooked up something that turns out to be flawed.

As you say, I think anything you can reproduce consistently and is unique
per pair of entityIDs is valid.

-- Scott