xml question about conf files

[Kevin Foote]

On 3/18/14, 10:46 AM, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

>On 3/18/14, 1:39 PM, "Joy Veronneau" <jv11 at cornell.edu> wrote:
>
>>Thanks to Kevin for your reply but I don't think I quite understand. Why
>>is the format of the two files different?
>
>The files date from different releases, basically (assuming they weren't
>explicitly modified with different namespace declarations, which I doubt).
>
>> Ideally, I would like to fix my production implementation to understand
>>the correct format?
>
>Then you can change the namespace declarations to be consistent.

Yea exactly.

Extrapolating the top of your (2) relying-party.xml to a couple of chunk
files here 
is a diff. Should show you the change point.

--- scratch2.prod       2014-03-18 11:31:33.000000000 -0700
+++ scratch.test        2014-03-18 11:47:54.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<RelyingPartyGroup xmlns="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party"
+<rp:RelyingPartyGroup xmlns:rp="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party"
 xmlns:saml="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml"
 xmlns:metadata="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:metadata"
 xmlns:resource="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:resource"



------
thanks,
 kevin.foote