IdP clustering without Terracotta?

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/6/14, 9:32 AM, "Joel Goguen" <joel.goguen at unb.ca> wrote:
>- Users must not notice if they get bounced between cluster members - it
>must appear to be a single service from the end-user's perspective.
>
>So... how far out in left field am I? Or is there something that could
>work well for me?

The only way I know of that would address that requirement is what Jim Fox
described, using Apache to auto-proxy requests across nodes.

The standard approaches to clustering that don't involve Terracotta and
all of the V3 approaches we will support assume stickiness through a
transaction.

You may also consider the use of active/passive instead of clustering.

-- Scott